Bibliography - General - About Languages (Structures, Typology)

Bibliography Evidentiality

Bibliography Dissociation

Bibliography - General - About Languages (Structures, Typology)

Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil and Bernard Comrie. 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN13: 9780199255917ISBN10: 0199255911 Hardback, 712 pages USD 467.50

Bibliography on Evidentiality (compiled by Anca GATA)

ARTICLES 

Bendix, Edward H. to appear. Evidentials and levels of assertion as strategic resources in Newari. In Jane H. Hill and Judith T. Irvine (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse.

ten Cate, Abraham P. 1996. Modality of verb forms in German reported speech. In: Janssen, Theo A. J. M. & Wim van der Wurff (eds), Reported Speech: Forms and Functions of the Verb: pp. 189 - 211. Amsterdam / Philadelphia, John Benjamins. 

Gren-Eklund, Gunilla. 2000. Evidentiality and typology: grammatical functions of particles in Burmese and the early stages of Indo-European Languages.In Lars Johanson & Bo Utas,  Evidentials. Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages: pp  367-381. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

De Haan, Ferdinand. 2000. The Relation between Modality and Evidentiality. In Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 00. 

Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. In Studies in Language 12:1: pp. 51 - 97.

Barnes, Janet. 1984. Evidentials in the Tuyuca verb.

Malone, Terrell A. 1988. "The origin and development of Tuyuca evidentials."

Willett, Thomas L. 1987. "A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality."

Floyd, Rick. 1989. "A cognitive analysis of evidentiality in Wanka."

Floyd, Rick. 1993. The structure of Wanka Quechua evidential categories.

Floyd, Rick. 1996. "Experience, certainty and control, and the direct evidential in Wanka quechua questions."

Floyd, Rick. 1996. "The radial structure of the Wanka reportative

Floyd, Rick. 1997. La estructura categorial de los evidenciales en el quechua wanka. 

Floyd, Rick. 1999. The structure of evidential categories in Wanka Quechua.  

VOLUMES

Ifantidou Elly. 2001. Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pragmatics & Beyond NS, 86. xii, 225 pp.  Hardcover, US & Canada: 1 58811 032 X USD 73.00 Rest of world: 90 272 5105 3 EUR 80.00

Bibliography on Dissociation (compiled by Anca GATA)

Carter, Bob (1998). Dangerous Phrases: Realism, "Race" and Social Science. In Alethia, Journal of Critical realism, Vol. 1, No. 2, September: 5-8.

Deppermann, Arnulf (2000). Semantic Shifts in Argumentative Processes: A Step Beyond the ‘Fallacy of Equivocation’. In Argumentation 14: 17–30.

Eemeren, F.H. van & P. Houtlosser (1998). Delivering the goods in critical discussion. In: F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair & Ch.A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, (pp. 163-167), Amsterdam: Sic Sat.

Eemeren, F.H. van & P. Houtlosser (2000). Rhetorical Analysis within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework. The Case of R. J. Reynolds. Argumentation 14, 293-305.

Eemeren, F.H. van & P. Houtlosser (2002). Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance. In: F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric. The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis (pp. 131-159), Dordrecht / Boston / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Eemeren, F.H. van & P. Houtlosser (2003a). Strategic Manoeuvring: William the Silent's Apologie. In: L.I. Komlósi, P. Houtlosser, M. Leezenberg (Eds.), Communication and Culture. Argumentative, Cognitive and Linguistic Perspectives (pp. 177-185), Amsterdam: Sic Sat.

Eemeren, F.H. van & P. Houtlosser (2003b). The Development of the Pragma-dialectical Approach to Argumentation. Argumentation 17, vol. 4, 387-403.

Eemeren, F.H. van & P. Houtlosser (2006). Strategic Maneuvering in Different Argumentative Activity Types. Invited presentation at Journée «Structures argumentatives et types d'arguments», May 26, Paris.

Eemeren, Frans F.H. van & Rob Grootendorst (1984). Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. Dordrecht / Cinnaminson: Foris Publications.

Eemeren, F.H. van & R. Grootendorst (1992). Argumentation, Comunication, Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ / Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Eemeren, F.H. van & R. Grootendorst (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eemeren, F.H. van (2005). Strategic Manoeuvring in Conventionalised Types of Argumentative Discourse. Invited paper at IADA Conference, «Cooperative and Conflictive Communication», May 26-29, University of Bucharest, Bucharest.

Eemeren, F.H. van, R. Grootendorst, F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.) (1996). Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Mahwah, NJ:  Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (2002). Argumentation. Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwak NJ / London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson, Scott Jacobs (1993). Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Tuscaloosa / London: The University of Alabama Press.

Fontanier, P. (1977). Les Figures du discours. Paris: Flammarion.

Fumaroli, Marc (dir.) (1999). Histoire de la rhétorique dans l'Europe moderne, 1450-1950. Paris: PUF.

Garssen, Bart (2003). Argument Schemes, in F. H. van Eemeren (ed.), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory: 81-99. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Gâţă, Anca (2005). La technique argumentative de dissociation: développements récents et applications, 15 décembre, Communication dans le cadre de l’Atelier Argumentation, Laboratoire CNRS "Communication et Politique", Paris.

Gâţă Anca (2006). Dissociation as a way of Strategic Manoeuvring, Communication dans le cadre de la Sixième Conférence de la Société Internationale pour l’Étude de l’Argumentation, ISSA, 27-30 juin, Amsterdam.

Goodwin, David (1991). Distinction, Argumentation, and the Rhetorical Construction of the Real. In Argumentation and Advocacy 27: 141-158.

Goodwin, David (1992). The Dialectic of Second-Order Distinctions: The Structure of Arguments about Fallacies. In Informal Logic 14: 11-22.

Grootendorst, R. (1998). Innocence by dissociation. A pragma-dialectical analysis of the fallacy of incorrect dissociation in the Vatican document ‘We remember: A reflection on the Shoah’. In: F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair & Ch.A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, (pp. 286-289), Amsterdam: Sic Sat.

Jackson, Sally (1992). ‘Virtual Standpoints’ and the Pragmatics of Conversational Argument. In F. H. van Eemeren et al. (éds.), Argumentation Illuminated: 260-269. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.

Jasinski, J. 2001. Sourcebook in Rhetoric. Thousand Oaks / London / New Delhi: Sage Publications Inc.

Jost Walter & Wendy Olmsted (ed.) 2004. Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism. pag. 267-277

Lynch, John (2006). Making Room for Stem Cells: Dissociation and Establishing New Research Objects. In Argumentation and Advocacy, 42.

Macagno, F. & D. Walton (2006). Argumentative Reasoning Patterns, Sixth Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument – CNMA6, 28-29 August, Riva del Garda.  http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~floriana/CMNA6/, consulted September 2006.

Ogden, C. K. & I. A. Richards (1923/1959). The Meaning of Meaning. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Perelman, Chaïm & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca (1958). La Nouvelle Rhétorique. Traité de l’argumentation, 2 vol. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Rees, Agnes M. van (2002). Argumentative functions of dissociation in everyday discussions”, in H.V. Hansen et al. (eds), Argumentation and its applications, Proceedings of the Fifth OSSA Conference.

Rees, Agnes M. van (2003). Indicators of Dissociation, in Frans H. van Eemeren et al. (eds), Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation: 887-892. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.

Rees, Agnes M. van (2005a). Dialectical Soundness of Dissociation, in D. Hitchcock (ed.), The Uses of Argument, Proceedings of a conference at McMaster University, 18-25 May 2005, Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation: 383-392.

Rees, Agnes M.  van (2005b). Dissociation: a Dialogue Technique. In Studies in Communication Sciences, “Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction”, Special Issue: 35-50.

Rees, Agnes M. van (2005c). Indicators of Dissociation, in Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser (eds), Argumentation in Practice: 53-67. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Rees, Agnes M.  van (2006). Strategic Maneuvering with Dissociation. In Argumentation, 20: 473-487.

Rees, Agnes M.  van (2007). Dissociation: between rhetorical success and dialectical soundness. Présentation, Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, June 27th-30th, Amsterdam: 1113-1117. Amsterdam: SicSat

Robinson, Richard (1962). Definition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Schiappa, E. (2003). Defining reality: Definitions and the politics of meaning. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Schiappa, Edward (1985). Dissociation in the Arguments of Rhetorical Theory. In Journal of the American Forensics Association 22: 72-82.

Schiappa, Edward (1993). Arguing about Definitions. In Argumentation 7: 403-417.

Schiappa, Edward (2001). What Is Golf?: Pragmatic Essentializing and Definitional Argument in PGA Tour Inc. V. Martin. In Argumentation and Advocacy 38: 18-27.

Stevenson, Charles L. (1938). Persuasive Definitions. In Mind 47: 331-350.

Stevenson, Charles L. (1944). Ethics and Language. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

Walton, Douglas 2001. Persuasive Definitions and Public Policy Arguments. In Argumentation and Advocacy, The Journal of the American Forensic Association 37: 117-132.

Zarefsky, David (1980). Lyndon Johnson redefines "equal opportunity": The beginnings of affirmative action. Central States Speech Journal, 31: 85-94.

Zarefsky, David (1997). Definitions, in J. F. Klumpp (ed.) Argument in a Time of Change: Definitions, Frameworks, and Critiques: 1-11. Annandale: National Communication Association.

Zarefsky, David (2006). Strategic Maneuvering through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialectic and Rhetoric. In Argumentation 20: 399-416.

Zarefsky, David, Frank E. Miller & Carol Miller-Tutzauer (1984). Regan's safety net for the truly needy: The rhetorical use of definition. In Central States Speech Journal 35: 113-119.